Saturday, February 4, 2012

Formulas for the Affect of 2012


                                                                 Formulas, Assignment 
February 4, 2012
Christy Warner

            The concept of formulas as it relates to this thesis, “The Mysteries of 2012 and its Effects on Today’s Culture”, is reliant upon history’s formula of eschatology.  The formula of humanity has long been tied to specific events believed to be the destiny of all humanity, or the ultimate end.  This end to humanity is communicated through religion as a future event foreseen in sacred texts and mythology.  As history is divided into “ages”, the Mayans and many other ancient cultures has prophesied our current age, 2012, as the end of one way of living, thinking, and being and the start of a new age of consciousness.
            Eschatology, as defined by most dictionaries, is “The science of last things, then, or the science of the ultimate analysis”.  “Whereas all other sciences: chemistry, physics, music, astronomy, physiology, and others are sciences of effect and deal with the relationships existing between and among those effects, Eschatology is the science of cause and deals exclusively in terms of cause” (Walter, 2012).  Therefore, the ending of 2012 is the end of an age, an era, or the world, as we know it.  Due to the misrepresentation of historical documents throughout time by religious organizations and interpreters, many in today’s society understand eschatology only as a cataclysmic end.  This narrow-minded process has led to a fear based society and public media enhancing this fear through films such as, 2012 and 2012: Doomsday.
            In a comparison of eschatology done by Contender Ministries on Muslim, Jewish, and Christian end-times prophecies, the following formulas are present in each religion:  1) resurrection of the body, 2) destruction of the present world, 3) signs preceding judgment day, 4) all physical people will experience physical death, and 5) hell as eternal punishment (Rast, 2012).  While these ancient religious text offer similarities, there are also differences.  One main difference is the “nature of God as judge”.  Islam believes the nature of God as judge as, “Allah is arbitrary.  Some are born to knowledge while others are not.  Sura 35:8, “Verily God misleadeth whom He will, and guideth whom He will.”” (Rast, 2012).  Judaism says, “YHWH is a just God.  Genesis 18:25-26, “Far be it from you to do such a thing – to kill the righteous with the wicked, treating the righteous and the wicked alike.  Far be it from you!  Will not the Judge of all the earth do right?  The Lord said, If I find fifty righteous people in the city of Sodom, I will spare the whole place for their sake.”” (Rast, 2012).  Christianity states, Romans 3:26, “God is just God”, II Peter 3:9, “The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness.  He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.” (Rast, 2012).  Through the differences, it is also apparent that “God is just a God”.
            The formulas presented in religious texts have helped shaped the formulas for humanity and the ongoing eschatology that the world will end as we know it.  In a philosophy class at Berkeley, Kant writes this in regards to The Formula of Humanity,
            Consider the following list of candidates for ends-in-themselves: persons, things that we   will as ends because we are inclined for them, and other things.  Things that we will as ends because we are inclined for them are (normative) ends only conditionally.  For one            thing, our willing them because we are inclined for them is necessary to make them       ends. Moreover our willing them because we are inclined for them is not even sufficient        to make them ends, since our achieving them is only good if we do so compatibly with a   good will. Other things are at most means. The only thing that is an end unconditionally         is a good will. Rationality is (a capacity for?) a good will. If X is an unconditional end,     then there is a categorical imperative to treat X as an end. Therefore, there is a        categorical imperative to treat rationality as an end (Kant, 2007).
With the most recent studies of the future and transhumanism, scientists and ancient texts believe that the 21st century will bring a course of change in human history.  In agreement with Kant, many of these conclusions can be categorized as rational.  It is the Sun’s life cycle that is affecting our solar system ultimately leading to the disappearance of life on earth.  Religious eschatology is known as the first strand of eschatology, and science is known as the second strand of rationalist based eschatology. 
            Like a circle and a cycle, “there is no beginning and no end”.  Humanity is formulated into progressive revelations and continued knowledge of existence.  The ultimate end is the answer to the question, “Why do we exist?”  The answer may be as simple as you desire or as difficult as you desire.  We know we do not exist for popular culture, big houses, new cars, country clubs, and other self-indulgences.  We exist to discover our higher potentials of consciousness and the greater good of humanity. 


                                                                                                                           
References
Rast, J. (2012). Muslim, Jewish, and Christian end-times prophecy comparison.  Contender Ministries. Retrieved on February 4, 2012, from http://contenderministries.org/prophecy/eschatology.php
Kant,. (2007). The  formula of humanity.  Berkeley.  Retrieved on February 4, 2012, from http://sophos.berkeley.edu/kolodny/S07Phil104H08(Kant).pdf
Walter, W. (2012). Science of Eschatology. The Walter Method. Retrieved on February 2, 2012, from http://www.eschatology-wwwalter.org/index.html
Image

No comments:

Post a Comment